Pygmalion - George Bernard Shaw
Summary Pygmalion tells the story of Eliza Doolittle, a Cockney flower girl, who makes a bet with Professor Henry Higgins, an arrogant but ...
Summary
Pygmalion tells the story of Eliza Doolittle, a Cockney flower girl, who makes a bet with Professor Henry Higgins, an arrogant but brilliant phonetics expert. Higgins boasts that he can transform Eliza's speech and manners to pass her off as a duchess. With the help of Colonel Pickering, Higgins undertakes Eliza's education. After months of intensive training, Eliza successfully performs at an "at home" gathering and later at an Embassy ball, convincing high society of her newfound refinement. However, upon her triumph, Higgins takes all the credit and treats her with indifference, leading Eliza to assert her independence and challenge his objectification. The play explores themes of social class, identity, language, and the nature of education, questioning what it means to be a "lady" and the responsibilities of a creator towards their creation.
Book Sections
Section 1 (Act I)
- Setting: Under the portico of St. Paul's Church, Covent Garden, London, during a heavy rain shower. A crowd has gathered, waiting for the rain to stop.
- Plot: Freddy Eynsford-Hill inadvertently knocks over Eliza Doolittle's basket of flowers while seeking a cab, and his mother and sister, Mrs. and Clara Eynsford-Hill, chastise him. Eliza is distressed by the loss of her flowers and tries to sell more. A gentleman (later revealed to be Colonel Pickering) takes notes on Eliza's speech, while another man (Professor Henry Higgins) criticizes her Cockney accent and accurately describes her origins and future based solely on her phonetics. Eliza is alarmed when she discovers Higgins is writing down everything she says, thinking he is a police informant. Higgins then demonstrates his phonetic skills by identifying the origins of several other people's accents. He boasts that he could pass Eliza off as a duchess within six months by teaching her proper English. Pickering, fascinated, offers to bet Higgins on this claim. Freddy, unable to find a cab, is dispatched by his mother to walk home. Eliza, despite her poverty, offers Pickering a flower.
| Character | Characteristics | Motivations |
|---|---|---|
| Eliza Doolittle | Cockney flower girl, uneducated, poor, strong accent, determined, vulnerable. | To earn a living, to sell flowers, to improve her social standing. |
| Professor H. Higgins | Brilliant phonetics expert, arrogant, impatient, self-centered, wealthy. | Scientific interest in phonetics, intellectual challenge, social experiment. |
| Colonel Pickering | Kind, courteous, respected linguist, scholarly. | Interest in Indian dialects, observation of Higgins's work, a gentlemanly bet. |
| Freddy Eynsford-Hill | Young gentleman, a bit foolish, easily flustered, later infatuated with Eliza. | To find a cab, to socialize, to obey his mother. |
| Mrs. Eynsford-Hill | Upper-class woman, somewhat snobbish, concerned with appearances. | To maintain social standing, to protect her children. |
| Clara Eynsford-Hill | Freddy's sister, tries to appear sophisticated and modern, follows trends. | To socialize, to seem fashionable and above the common folk. |
Section 2 (Act II)
- Setting: Professor Higgins's laboratory-study in Wimpole Street, the next morning.
- Plot: Higgins is playing phonograph records of various dialects when Pickering arrives. Higgins explains his theories on language and social class. Eliza Doolittle then appears at Higgins's door, announcing that she wants to learn to speak "proper English" so she can work in a flower shop, rather than selling flowers on the street. She references Higgins's earlier boast about turning her into a duchess. Higgins and Pickering are amused by her audacity. Higgins, seeing it as an intriguing challenge, agrees to take her on. Pickering challenges Higgins's prediction, offering to pay for Eliza's lessons if Higgins succeeds in passing her off at an ambassador's garden party. Mrs. Pearce, Higgins's housekeeper, expresses her concerns about Eliza's future and Higgins's inappropriate behavior, urging him to consider the moral implications. Eliza is bathed, dressed in new clothes, and given a room. Her father, Alfred Doolittle, a dustman, arrives to demand money for his daughter, but not out of paternal concern; rather, he sees it as an opportunity for extortion. Higgins is impressed by Doolittle's eloquent and unique philosophy on being "undeserving poor" and offers him a sum, which Doolittle accepts readily.
| Character | Characteristics | Motivations |
|---|---|---|
| Mrs. Pearce | Sensible, moral, protective housekeeper for Higgins, somewhat motherly figure. | To maintain order in the household, to protect Eliza's welfare, to manage Higgins. |
Section 3 (Act III)
- Setting: Mrs. Higgins's drawing-room, several months later, during her "at home" day.
- Plot: Higgins brings Eliza to his mother's house as a "trial run" to see how well she can interact with polite society. Mrs. Higgins is wary of her son's experiment. The Eynsford-Hills (Mrs. Eynsford-Hill, Clara, and Freddy) are among the guests. Eliza's appearance is transformed; she is elegantly dressed and speaks with improved pronunciation, but her conversation topics and vocabulary remain distinctly working-class, particularly her vivid descriptions of her family and her use of Cockney slang, such as discussing her aunt's death from "influenza" and "gin." Higgins and Pickering cover for her, explaining that her speech is the "new small talk." Freddy Eynsford-Hill is captivated by Eliza, while his mother and sister find her peculiar but intriguing. After the guests leave, Mrs. Higgins scolds Henry and Pickering for their irresponsible experiment, reminding them that Eliza is a human being with feelings, not just a phonetic subject. She questions what will become of Eliza once the experiment is over.
| Character | Characteristics | Motivations |
|---|---|---|
| Mrs. Higgins | Intelligent, sophisticated, elegant, observant, critical of her son's manners. | To maintain her social standing, to provide counsel to her son, to socialize. |
Section 4 (Act IV)
- Setting: Higgins's laboratory, past midnight, after the Embassy ball.
- Plot: Eliza, Higgins, and Pickering return from the Embassy ball, where Eliza has achieved a spectacular triumph, having successfully passed as a high-born lady. Higgins and Pickering congratulate each other profusely on their success, utterly ignoring Eliza, who fetched Higgins's slippers and is exhausted but radiant. They discuss Eliza as if she were an object, speculating about her origins and remarking on the ease with which she fooled everyone. Higgins expresses relief that the "damned thing is over" and wonders what he will do with his slippers, implying Eliza's role as a servant. Eliza, feeling used, discarded, and deeply hurt by their insensitivity, furiously throws Higgins's slippers at him. She expresses her anguish over her uncertain future – she is now too refined for her old life but has no place in high society without Higgins, who has not taught her how to live independently. She asks what is to become of her. Higgins is perplexed by her outburst, unable to comprehend her feelings. Eliza returns the jewels Higgins gave her. Higgins attempts to regain control of the situation, but Eliza's resolve is firm. She walks out of the house into the night, leaving Higgins bewildered and angry.
Section 5 (Act V)
- Setting: Mrs. Higgins's drawing-room, the next morning.
- Plot: Higgins and Pickering arrive at Mrs. Higgins's house, frantic because Eliza has run away. Higgins, still oblivious to Eliza's emotional distress, is more concerned about finding his slippers and the whereabouts of his property (Eliza). Mrs. Higgins is disgusted by their insensitivity and informs them that Eliza is safe with her. Alfred Doolittle then enters, transformed into a wealthy, respectable gentleman, dressed in a fashionable frock coat. He explains that Higgins, in a casual letter to an American millionaire, had light-heartedly recommended Doolittle as "the most original moralist in England." The millionaire, upon his death, bequeathed Doolittle a substantial annual income, provided he lecture for a moral reform society. Doolittle now feels trapped by respectability and the burdens of wealth. Eliza enters, composed and dignified, and has a confrontation with Higgins. She explains that she now feels capable of living independently and considers working as a phonetics teacher herself, or perhaps marrying Freddy. She acknowledges that the greatest lesson Higgins taught her was self-respect and the ability to choose her own path. She thanks Pickering for treating her like a lady, in contrast to Higgins's scientific detachment. Higgins is angered but also proud of her newfound strength. The play ends ambiguously regarding Eliza's immediate future with Higgins; she declares her independence, and he is left to ponder his transformation and hers.
| Character | Characteristics | Motivations |
|---|---|---|
| Alfred Doolittle | Eliza's father, dustman, eloquent, philosophically inclined, embraces poverty, later forced into wealth. | To extort money, to avoid respectability, later to cope with the burden of wealth. |
Genre:
Comedy of manners, Social criticism, Satirical play.
Author Information:
George Bernard Shaw (1856-1950) was an Irish playwright, critic, polemicist, and political activist. He wrote more than 60 plays, including 'Man and Superman', 'Major Barbara', and 'Saint Joan'. He was a prominent socialist and a co-founder of the London School of Economics. Shaw was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1925, but initially refused the monetary prize, only accepting it later to fund translations of Swedish books. He is the only person to have been awarded both a Nobel Prize and an Oscar (for his adapted screenplay of 'Pygmalion' in 1938). His works often used wit and satire to critique Victorian-era social issues, class distinction, and traditional morality.
Morale/Lesson:
The primary moral of 'Pygmalion' is that true refinement and worth come not from superficial manners, accent, or social status, but from self-respect, independence, and the ability to think and act for oneself. The play critiques the rigid class system, showing how language and outward appearances are often mistaken for intrinsic value. It also explores the responsibilities of a "creator" towards their "creation" and the dehumanizing effects of treating individuals as mere objects of experiment or social climbing. Education can elevate, but true liberation requires more than just instruction; it demands emotional intelligence and recognition of one's inherent dignity.
Curiosities:
- Mythological Inspiration: The play's title refers to the Greek myth of Pygmalion, a sculptor who falls in love with his own creation, Galatea. Shaw inverted the myth; while Higgins shapes Eliza, he initially resists recognizing her as a human with feelings, and it is Eliza who ultimately brings herself to life and asserts her independence.
- Ending Controversy: Shaw's original ending for the play, where Eliza firmly rejects Higgins and plans to marry Freddy, was often altered in early productions to suggest a romantic pairing between Eliza and Higgins. Shaw vehemently opposed this "happy ending" and even wrote a prose epilogue to clarify Eliza's fate, emphasizing her independence and her eventual marriage to Freddy.
- 'My Fair Lady': 'Pygmalion' was the basis for the highly successful 1956 Broadway musical and 1964 film 'My Fair Lady', starring Rex Harrison as Henry Higgins and Audrey Hepburn as Eliza Doolittle. The musical significantly softened Shaw's original ending, implying a potential romantic future for the two protagonists, much to Shaw's theoretical chagrin.
- Phonetics' Influence: Shaw himself was deeply interested in phonetics and language reform. He dedicated a portion of his Nobel Prize money to developing a new phonetic alphabet, the "Shavian alphabet," with the aim of simplifying English spelling.
- Historical Context: The play was first performed in 1913, reflecting the social anxieties and class consciousness of Edwardian England, a period just before World War I when traditional hierarchies were beginning to be questioned.
